What was a significant critique regarding the small sample size in Andrade's study?

What was a significant critique regarding the small sample size in Andrade's study?

• A. It was too diverse
• B. It may not represent the entire population
• C. It lacked a control group
• D. It caused biased results

Answer: (B)

A significant critique of small sample sizes in research studies, such as Andrade's, is that they may not accurately represent the entire population. When the sample size is limited, there is a higher likelihood that the findings are specific to the individuals included in the sample rather than applicable to a broader audience. This can lead to concerns about the generalizability of the results, as the characteristics and behaviors of the participants may not reflect those of other groups or the population at large. In the context of Andrade's study, the small sample might mean that the conclusions drawn about the effects of doodling on memory may not hold true for different demographics or settings outside of the study. Thus, while the findings may be significant for the sample at hand, they may not provide a reliable foundation for making claims applicable to everyone, limiting the study's impact and utility in understanding the phenomenon in a more universal context.

A significant critique of small sample sizes in research studies, such as Andrade's, is that they may not accurately represent the entire population. When the sample size is limited, there is a higher likelihood that the findings are specific to the individuals included in the sample rather than applicable to a broader audience. This can lead to concerns about the generalizability of the results, as the characteristics and behaviors of the participants may not reflect those of other groups or the population at large.

In the context of Andrade's study, the small sample might mean that the conclusions drawn about the effects of doodling on memory may not hold true for different demographics or settings outside of the study. Thus, while the findings may be significant for the sample at hand, they may not provide a reliable foundation for making claims applicable to everyone, limiting the study's impact and utility in understanding the phenomenon in a more universal context.